Research: A Typology and Policy Landscape Analysis of State Investments in Short Term Credential Pathways

Last Updated: 03/09/2024

Relational Map coming soon. Learn more about the work we’re doing with AI and view our example prototypes here.

Overview

Many states have adopted strategies to recognize short-term credentials, however, there has been little coordinated information about these developments. HCM Strategists conducted a study (Stephanie M. Murphy, 2023) to develop a comprehensive classification system (typology) of direct and sustained state funding for short-term credential programs. The study’s scope focused on credentials granted by public and private postsecondary institutions upon the satisfactory completion of coursework and/or assessments, including both for-credit and not-for-credit programs.

The study defined “short-term credentials as educational achievements that require less than one year of full-time study, aligning with the definition commonly used in federal data systems.”

Five key research questions drove the investigation:

  1. What states are appropriating funds to support the creation, expansion, or durability of short-term credential programs and pathways?
  2. What are the various components of these existing investments?
  3. What are states funding — student aid to defray the costs of tuition and fees or institutions to build capacity to offer more and stronger programming?
  4. What funding sources are available and is there a consideration of sustainability?
  5. What are the elements of strong policy design on short-term credentials and how can existing policies be improved?

The methodology included:

  • Examination of the 50 U.S. states to collect information from legislation, state budgets, existing research, and direct communication with state higher education leaders on state investments and policies around short-term sub-baccalaureate credentials, with a particular focus on quality and equity.
  • Quantitative and qualitative research methods to provide a nuanced and evidence-based understanding of state investments and policies.
  • Identification of trends or best practices from the scan.
  • Analysis of dataset.

The classification system depicts state investments in short-term credential pathways by key benchmarks (these are specified in the report):

  • Whether and how states clearly define short-term credentials to help establish a consistent understanding of these programs.
  • Whether policies are equity-centered in design and delivery, ensuring that diverse populations have equal access to these valuable learning opportunities,
  • Revenue sources and sustainability to understand how states allocate funds and maintain ongoing support.
  • Whether states commit to an assurance of value or quality, demonstrating a dedication to providing impactful, high-quality programs to learners.

Findings

  • The research identified 59 state-led initiatives across 28 states.
  • Investments in these programs total no less than $3.81 billion.
  • There is variation in how the states define short-term credentials in state policies (the report acknowledges deviations from the study’s definition when relevant).
  • 27 of the initiatives provide financial aid directly to students to defray program costs.
  • 15 state initiatives allocate funding to institutions with the aim of providing a means to offer student supports and/or tuition relief.
  • 6 states within the dataset provide funding to institutions to promote capacity-building and foster the development of short-term credential programs that align with workforce needs.
  • 5 states integrate funding for short-term credentials into their outcomes-based funding formula.
  • Many programs (classified as “other” in the report) fund the development of a tool, framework, or further research on short-term credentials to help inform future policies.
  • 25 initiatives are funded using the state’s general funds.
  • 4 states (Florida, Tennessee, Texas, Utah) allocate state formula funding for short-term credentials through an outcomes-based funding model, which distributes money based on student performance.
  • 11 initiatives made use of federal Covid-19 emergency relief dollars to pay for one-time or pilot programs.

Resources

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/62bdd1bbd6b48a2f0f75d310/t/648c972a23cb3714b750b74b/1686935342423/HCM+-+STC+paper+-+FINAL062023.pdf

 

KEY COMPONENTS

STAKEHOLDER GROUPS

INITIATIVE LAUNCH YEAR

2023

Request an Edit

Have something to add or refine? Your input in this work matters greatly and we look forward to reviewing your additions

Organizations (275)

Initiatives (309)

Topics (93)

Skip to content