Qualifications Frameworks (QFs)

Last Updated: 01/09/2024

Relational Map coming soon. Learn more about the work we’re doing with AI and view our example prototypes here.

Overview

Qualifications frameworks (QFs) refer to the structures designed at the national, regional (groups of nations), and/or international levels to guide planning, implementation, and maintenance of education and training systems, particularly higher education systems. The term, qualifications, refers to the categories and descriptions of the levels of educational and vocational qualifications (the quality or accomplishment that makes someone suitable for a particular job or activity). When combined into a framework, the qualifications enable understanding and comparisons among the different levels of qualifications.

The levels within Qualifications Frameworks are often described by learning outcomes, skills, and knowledge that are aligned with the levels. Attention to learning outcomes, skills, and knowledge are especially spurred by growing needs for a skilled workforce in many nations. This has resulted in an emphasis on credentials such as academic degrees, certificates, licenses, and microcredentials which are described in the various levels of many Qualifications Framework.

Qualifications Frameworks are used to:

  • Help create the conditions for consistency and transparency in educational and training systems operated within a nation, region, and/or globally.
  • Enable employers and educational institutions to assess and recognize qualifications, which in turn facilitate mobility and transferability across education and training pathways.
  • Enable individuals to learn the various levels of education and training which may be pertinent to their interests and plan their education and career pathways.
  • Create quality assurance indicators used by third-party groups established by governments and industries to provide checks and balances to educational and training systems. These may include reviewing the levels of Qualifications Frameworks, the learning outcomes at each level, the standards-setting approaches, and evidence of learner outcomes. Key to checks and balances is the determination of each qualification level (for example, what is a level 1, 2, 3 or 4 and why?)

Development of a Nation’s Qualifications Framework

The processes and timeline for developing a Qualifications Framework vary significantly among nations. Key factors that impact the process and timeline include the type of existing education system, political environment, stakeholder collaboration, and complexity of the envisioned framework. Generally, the development of a national Qualifications Framework takes years and a complex process:

  • Timeline: Developing a Qualifications Frameworks involves stages such as research, consultation, drafting, pilot testing, and implementation. Nations typically invest time in engaging stakeholders, including governmental bodies, educational institutions, employers, and industry representatives. The timeline can range from a few years to more than a decade, depending on the country's specific context and requirements.
  • Financial Investment: Developing and managing a Qualifications Framework can be a significant financial commitment. Countries may allocate resources from their education budgets or seek support from international organizations to fund these initiatives. The financial investment in overseeing and managing a Qualifications Framework depends on various factors, such as the size of the country, complexity of its education system, and extent of stakeholder involvement. Funding may be allocated for research, consultation processes, capacity building, infrastructure, and/or ongoing maintenance.
  • Changes and Revisions: After initial development, Qualifications Frameworks are not viewed as static. Changes and revisions typically occur periodically to ensure that the framework remains relevant, aligns with evolving educational needs, and addresses emerging trends in the job market. The frequency of changes varies but commonly involves a periodic review process.
  • Maintenance/Sustainability Costs: Ongoing maintenance/sustainability costs for a Qualifications Framework include expenses related to periodic reviews, updates, and the management of information systems supporting the Qualifications Framework. Such financial commitments vary based on the scale of the framework and the efficiency of the supporting infrastructure.

Role of Learning Outcomes

The learning outcomes used to describe the levels in Qualifications Frameworks typically prescribe what learners will know and be able to do when they successfully complete a period of study, a course, or an educational or training program. Learning outcomes are often statements that describe three domains: knowledge, skills, and competences.

Examples of Qualifications Frameworks in Different Nations

The following examples illustrate the diverse applications of Qualifications Frameworks. They range from regional collaborations like the European Qualifications Framework to national frameworks that are tailored to specific education sectors such as the National Qualifications Framework for Higher Education in South Africa. The management of Qualifications Frameworks involve close collaboration between governmental bodies, educational institutions, and relevant stakeholders to maintain effectiveness and relevance.

  • European Qualifications Framework (EQF): The EQF is a comprehensive framework adopted by European countries to facilitate the comparison and recognition of qualifications across the European Union. It covers qualifications from all levels, including basic education, vocational training, and higher education. The EQF is managed by the European Commission in collaboration with member states and stakeholders. Each participating country aligns its national qualifications framework with the EQF, ensuring consistency and compatibility.
  • National Qualifications Framework for Higher Education in South Africa (NQF-HESA): The NQF-HESA is a framework specific to higher education in South Africa. It outlines the levels and qualifications within the higher education sector, including certificates, diplomas, and degrees. The South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) is responsible for managing the NQF-HESA. SAQA works closely with universities and other higher education institutions to align their programs with the framework.
  • Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF): The AQF is Australia's national framework that encompasses qualifications from schooling to higher education and vocational training. It defines the standards for each qualification level, promoting consistency and recognition across the education and training sectors. The Australian Qualifications Framework Council (AQFC) oversees the AQF. It includes representatives from government, education providers, industry, and regulatory bodies to ensure the relevance and integrity of the framework.

The Degree Qualifications Profile in the United States

Released in 2011 by Lumina Foundation, the Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP) was updated in 2014, and again in 2021, with the assistance of the National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA) and based on feedback from over 800 higher education institutions. Birth and Growth DQP 3.0 document provides a quick history of the DQP and information that informed the revision process. A one-pager highlighting revisions is found here.

The DQP describes what degree recipients should know and be able to do through proficiencies that benchmark the associate, bachelor’s, and master’s degrees—regardless of a student’s field of specialization. The DQP drew on more than a decade of debate and effort across all levels of U.S. higher education and in countries throughout the world to define learning outcomes that graduates are expected to fulfill in preparation for work, citizenship, global participation and life.

While clarity and consensus were goals of the DQP process, the DQP did not attempt to “standardize” U.S. degrees. Rather, it recognized the role and responsibility of faculty to determine both the content appropriate to different areas of study and the best ways to teach that content. The DQP described, therefore, generic forms of student performance appropriate for each degree level through clear reference points that indicated the incremental, integrative and cumulative nature of learning.

The DQP focuses in five areas:

  • Specialized/Industry Knowledge addresses what students in any specialization, major field of study, or career pathway should demonstrate with respect to that specialization.
  • Broad and Integrative Knowledge asks students to bring together learning from industry knowledge, experience, and/or different fields of study to discover and explore the implications of concepts and questions that bridge essential areas of learning/practice as well as integrate their knowledge to advance solutions in support of a humane, just, and democratic society.
  • Intellectual Skills include: analytic inquiry, use of information resources, engaging diverse perspectives, ethical reasoning, quantitative fluency and communicative fluency.
  • Applied and Collaborative Learning emphasizes what students can do with what they know. Students are asked to demonstrate their learning by addressing unscripted problems in scholarly inquiry, at work and in other settings outside the classroom, individually and in teams.
  • Civic/Democratic and Global Learning recognizes higher education’s responsibilities both to democracy and the global community. Students engage in integration of their knowledge and skills by addressing and responding to civic, social, environmental, economic, equity, inclusion, and social justice challenges at local, national, and global levels.

Alternate Terms

  • National Qualifications Framework (NQF): Used by several countries as a specific term for their national Qualifications Framework, such as the NQF in South Africa.
  • Education and Training Framework: Some countries use broader terms that encompass both education and vocational training within a single framework.
  • Credit and Qualifications Framework: The emphasis may be on both credit accumulation and qualifications, highlighting the transferability of learning outcomes.
  • Transnational qualifications frameworks: These are developed across a range of countries.
  • Learning outcomes: These can be used to describe knowledge, skills, and abilities or competences (KSAs or KSCs) in the context of QFs. Learning outcomes can be described in QFs as well as in the formulation of educational and training level descriptors (which may not be in a QF).

Nations without a Qualifications Framework: Challenges and Benefits

Challenges. Many nations (for example, the United States) do not have a comprehensive Qualifications Framework to guide their higher education systems. Several challenges can arise in nations without a Qualifications Framework:

  • Lack of Standardization: Without a unified framework, there may be variations in the structure and standards of qualifications. This can make it challenging to compare and recognize qualifications both nationally and internationally.
  • Difficulty in Mobility: Students and professionals may face difficulties when transferring among different education and training programs, as the recognition of prior learning may be inconsistent.
  • Limited Recognition: Qualifications earned in one institution or region may not be widely recognized or understood in other parts of the country or globally. This can negatively impact employability and educational opportunities.
  • Quality Assurance Concerns: Ensuring the quality and relevance of educational programs and qualifications may be challenging, potentially leading to inconsistencies in educational outcomes.
  • International Recognition Issues: Nations without a Qualifications Framework may find it challenging to align their educational systems with global standards. This can affect the international recognition of their qualifications.

Benefits. Education and training enterprises in many nations operate effectively without a formalized Qualifications Framework. Benefits may include:

  • Decentralized Governance: Some nations may prioritize decentralized governance of education, allowing individual institutions or regions greater autonomy in shaping their educational systems. This decentralization may be seen as advantageous for tailoring education to local needs.
  • Flexibility and Adaptability: Without a Qualifications Frameworks (many are viewed as too rigid), educational systems may have more flexibility to adapt quickly to changing economic or technological landscapes. This adaptability can be beneficial for countries experiencing rapid shifts in industry needs.
  • Cultural and Regional Tailoring: Without a standardized framework, education systems may have the freedom to tailor curricula and qualifications to better reflect local cultures, values, and specific regional needs. This can foster a sense of ownership and relevance within the community.
  • Innovation and Experimentation: Lack of a formal Qualifications Framework may enable greater experimentation and innovation in educational approaches. Institutions may have more freedom to explore alternative teaching methods or interdisciplinary programs.
  • Avoiding or Limiting Bureaucratic Overhead: Establishing and maintaining a national Qualifications Framework requires administrative infrastructure, and some nations may prefer to allocate resources differently, avoiding potential bureaucratic overhead associated with implementation and management of Qualifications Frameworks.

History

The concept of a Qualifications Framework grew out of developments in many ancient cultures. Civilizations in Greece, Rome, and China, for example, identified systems of education to enable certain groups of their population (scribes, priests) to obtain needed knowledge and skills.

As the practices of education and vocational training evolved, they became more accessible and necessary for the masses. In such a context, Qualifications Frameworks became a tool to build education and training systems that would enable people to move among national, regional, and international boundaries and ensure that people’s knowledge, skills, and competencies would be recognizable by employers and other educational institutions.

Examples:

  • During the Middle Ages, education was primarily obtainable for those in the clergy. A new approach to education developed in the late medieval centuries as emerging economic interests resulted in banking and importing/exporting goods across Europe and the West. These developments led to the evolution of cities and forms of education and training available to the middle classes.
  •  The Chinese civilization was organized with a series of educational levels attached to examinations -- and used to enable access to public office.

Over the past 50 years, Qualifications Frameworks have commonly bridged two education and training areas: vocational/occupational education’s growing focus on competencies; and growing focus on learning outcomes framed within a lifelong learning concept.

In the present increasingly global context, there is growing recognition of the importance of learning and learner mobility; global standards for skills building and upskilling in many occupational and professional areas (for example, technology, cybersecurity, engineering, law, medicine, architecture); and employer hiring for credentials and skills, especially among global companies. These changes may influence nations, regions, and international entities to develop Qualifications Frameworks to address need for common language and standards in educational and training, mobility, transparency, leveraging resources, and quality assurance.

References

Competency Modeling for Beginners| Blog | CABEM Technologies https://www.cabem.com/competency-modeling-for-beginners/

Connecting Credentials: A Beta Credentials Framework - Credential Engine

DQP - National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment

dqp.pdf (luminafoundation.org)

https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/

https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/dqp/

https://www.careeronestop.org/CompetencyModel/competency-models/pyramid-home.aspx

https://www.careeronestop.org/CompetencyModel/

https://cte.ed.gov/initiatives/employability-skills-framework

https://www.bing.com/search?q=%E2%80%A2+U.S.+Department+of+Labor+Competency+Models.&cvid=37304db78a8a4a1da5392711301b16fd&aqs=edge..69i57j0l8.4352j0j4&FORM=ANAB01&PC=HCTS

https://credentialfinder.org/search?searchType=competencyframework

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualifications_framework

The Training Industry: https://trainingindustry.com/wiki/professional-development/competency-model/

 

Request an Edit

Have something to add or refine? Your input in this work matters greatly and we look forward to reviewing your additions

Organizations (274)

Initiatives (294)

Topics (93)