Show All Definitions
Transferring occurs from one educational institution to another. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, over a million students have transferred among colleges since 2015. Students can transfer from a community college or two-year program to a four-year college or university to graduate with both an associate and bachelor’s degree (this is called reverse transfer). Students can transfer in between all types of institutions – private, public, large, small, community, and research. Students can also transfer college credits from a high school dual-credit program to a two- or four-year program, and can use those credits toward their degree. Transfer includes the transition of credits from one institution to another, while still maintaining the value of those credits. Course articulation is an important part of that. Course articulation is the process of comparing the content of courses that are transferred between postsecondary institutions – one institution matches its courses or requirements to coursework completed at another institution. Transfer systems can be set up within states or systems. To make this process easier, some schools offer guaranteed transfer credit acceptance if students transfer from pre-approved schools.
According to EDUCAUSE, the domain refers to the functions and resources in education that enable faculty, staff, and students to communicate and collaborate with others on and off campus. Depending on the institution, services may include:
Services typically not included:
Credential Management System (CMS) is a broad term that refers to the software used for issuing and managing credentials. Governments and other enterprises employ CMS software to issue and manage credentials using an array of devices, including laptop computers, smart cards, smartphones, and USB keys. (Wikipedia)
In the higher education and third-party credentialing arena, the term is commonly used to refer to integrated Credential Management Systems (Credential As You Go, Playbook on Technology-Integrated Credential Management). Integrated CMS use a comprehensive solution for managing a variety of credentials. The system streamlines the entire life cycle of credentialing—from a credential’s proposal and development to its issuance and verification. CMS operations typically include: conducting academic program reviews and documenting approvals; creating catalogs and marketing materials; processing learner applications; managing scheduling and enrollment; handling finances/billing; tracking individual learners’ progress; providing counseling/advising; conducting audits; issuing credentials; managing learner transcripts; facilitating graduation communications; and generating internal and external reports.
To support these operations, many credential providers rely on a variety of IT systems and applications. By leveraging systems effectively and ensuring their seamless integration, entities can streamline credential management processes, enhance data accuracy, and improve overall operational efficiency. The most commonly used systems and applications include:
According to EDUCAUSE, refers to an institutional platform that provides electronic distribution of text, enabling students to access e-books/e-texts on mobile devices and offering additional features such as annotation, search across texts, and note sharing. Basic systems deliver existing packaged e-content; advanced systems enable collection, copyright clearance, and bundling of content similar to e-texts and e-coursepacks.
According to EDUCAUSE, refers to the functions and resources associated with and specific to supporting teaching and learning at higher education institutions. They often include:
They typically do not include:
The Federal purpose license is a policy in existing federal regulations: “The Federal awarding agency reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use the work for Federal purposes, and to authorize others to do so.”
A 2022 White House directive would make a change to this policy in response to calls for more open access expansion; i.e., making federally funded research freely available to the public immediately after publication of the research. If the directive goes forward, authors who use grant funding to produce research will be required to deposit their work into agency-designated public-access repositories as soon as it is published. That process would eliminate the current option for authors or their publishers to place a 12-month embargo on public access to government-funded research publications (rule in place since 2013). The purpose of lifting the embargo as described in the 2022 White House memo (known as the Nelson memo) is to promote “equity and advance the work of restoring the public’s trust in Government science, and to advance American scientific leadership.” These changes will impact authors, their institutions, and the offices that deal with research funding and grant compliance. Academic libraries, especially at doctoral-granting institutions, will play a key role in advancing open access through multiple pathways and engaging authors in scholarly publishing and research data management.
The Nelson memo calls for implementation of the policy change by 2026. Groups supporting the change include open-access advocates and library groups. They believe the change will provide grant recipients with a clear understanding of their obligations as authors and facilitate better compliance with funder requirements. Opponents include many members of Congress and many academic publishers who contend that the new policy would limit researchers’ ability to maintain control of their published work and would cut into the multi-billion-dollar academic publishing industry’s profit margins.
The current academic publishing industry’s business model relies on authors’ willingness to submit their work for free—or even pay to publish it—and the publisher’s ability to sell that research to academic libraries through expensive journal subscriptions. The Nelson memo raises a dilemma for publishers: determine how the industry can and should respond to increasing calls for open-access expansion by adapting their business models and aligning more closely with what authors and funding agencies want; or staying with the existing model that depends on retaining as much exclusive rights as they can for authors’ articles.
Refers to methods used to create, share, use, and manage the knowledge and information of an organization; and the technology that makes it possible to store, access, and update information. KM technology is a portal that links many databases together and enables the exploration of one or multiple sources simultaneously.
KM in the information-age requires an increasingly large proportion of the working population to consist of information workers. In this context, KM is a movement to create an information environment conducive to successful research and development—one that depends on extensive and deep open communication and information access that can be shared broadly across an organization.
Many organizations develop a knowledge management system to conduct their business efficiently and effectively. Common steps include: 1) knowledge creation; 2) organization of knowledge; 3) sharing of knowledge; 4) acting on knowledge; and 5) updating knowledge.
Main KM strategies include: 1) collecting and recording information (codification), 2) spreading information (dissemination), and 3) tailoring information to specific audiences (personalization). Most organizations with knowledge management systems use a blend of these strategies.
In the KM literature, knowledge is often categorized as:
According to EDUCAUSE, refers to a group of two or more colleges or universities—each with substantial autonomy and headed by a chief executive or operating officer—that fall under a single governing board served by a system chief executive officer who is not also the chief executive officer of any of the individual higher education institutions. Such a system is to be distinguished from a “flagship” campus with branch campuses and also from a group of campuses or systems, each with its own governing board, that is coordinated by some state body.
A measure that organizations use to assess the strength of their recruiting process. The new hire retention rate calculates the percentage of new hires (e.g., middle management, specialists, operational workers, office staff, senior management, executives) who are still employed at the business entity 12 months after accepting a job offer.
Refer to specialized higher education programs that are typically designed to cater to specific high-demand industries or unique interests. These programs are generally not widely available elsewhere.
Examples of nearly 30 niche programs offered by higher education institutions:
Refers to models that make government services more user-friendly, coordinated, and equitable. Many states have established “one door” models for public supports (also known as “no wrong door” or “single point of entry” systems). These models streamline access to various government services and programs via a centralized entry point. The approach simplifies the process for individuals and families seeking assistance, particularly those who may face barriers due to complex administrative systems, limited resources, or lack of knowledge about available services.
Key Features:
Benefits:
Examples:
As defined by the Velocity Network Foundation, in decentralized identity systems, a presentation is the act of showing credentials to a verifier. It involves selectively disclosing certain parts of a credential to prove authenticity without revealing more information than necessary, ensuring privacy-preserving verifications.
Refer to structures designed at the national, regional (groups of nations), and/or international levels to guide planning, implementation, and maintenance of education and training systems, particularly higher education systems. The term, qualifications, refers to the categories and descriptions of the levels of educational and vocational qualifications (the quality or accomplishment that makes someone suitable for a particular job or activity). When combined into a framework, the qualifications enable understanding and comparisons among the different qualifications. Levels within Qualifications Frameworks are often described by learning outcomes, skills, and knowledge that are aligned with the levels.
Qualifications Frameworks are used to:
See Topic Brief: Qualifications Frameworks (QFs) | Learn & Work Ecosystem Library
The National Science Foundation’s Systems Research Networks and Smart and Connected Communities Programs are part of NSF’s portfolio of investments in interdisciplinary research that advance fundamental knowledge about urban, rural, and other communities and systems.
SRS Programs define sustainable regional systems as connected urban and rural systems, including all systems in between, designed with the goal of measurably advancing the equitable well-being of people and the planet. Regions are defined as networks of urban, rural, and all systems in between, that make up a dynamic, symbiotic system with complex social and physical interactions. Urban systems are geographical areas with a high concentration of human activity and interactions, embedded within multi-scale interdependent social, engineered, and natural systems. Rural systems are any settlements with population, housing, economic activity, or areas not in an urban geographical area.
S&CC Program defines a smart and connected community as a community that synergistically integrates intelligent technologies with the natural and built environments, including infrastructure, to improve the social, economic, and environmental well-being of those who live, work, or travel within it. Communities are defined as having geographically-delineated boundaries – such as towns, cities, counties, neighborhoods, community districts, rural areas, and tribal regions – consisting of various populations, with the structure and ability to engage in meaningful ways with proposed research activities.
Refers to a concept promulgated by the National Association of Higher Education Systems (NASH), on behalf of its network of 51 higher education systems working collaboratively to address critical issues in higher education. The concept is founded in the recognition that systems working together are greater than the sum of their parts. The core of their commitment is to leverage their power to convene and facilitate, along with their governing and policy-making authority, to build collaborations to support students and campuses—rather than trying to mediate competitive actions.